I’m glad observe eHarmony answering inside their recognized web log to articles called “Marriage-Maker Claims Are Tied in Knots ” from the Wall Street diary. The WSJ article examines a number of the matrimony data launched by online lesbian sugar baby dating sites like eHarmony in addition to the methodology familiar with calculate these statistics. We spoke a little relating to this subject as well, a couple of weeks ago whenever the original WSJ article had been published (see tale).

The WSJ post failed to look to kindly from the statistics revealed by adult dating sites, and for the many part I buy into the writer. People ought to know exactly how these statistics are generated. Of the many internet dating sites pointed out from inside the WSJ post, “eHarmony stands out as on the list of more mindful people”. It is not exactly a glowing report for eHarmony so, they made a decision to post a response to their web log.

For the eHarmony blog post each goes into additional precisely the way they calculated that their dating internet site was responsible for 2% of marriages in the us, from the 12-month period finishing March 2007. Most of the info we currently understood about from a previously revealed PDF document called “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 Marriage Metrics amount of eHarmony Marriages” (see Story), although post really does clean out some more details. What this website article does show is, eHarmony is attempting become as open and transparent due to their analysis results as possible. I believe title “Open Communication” may undoubtedly be a good solution for formal eHarmony blog.

Here’s the complete eHarmony response to the Wall Street diary about how precisely they assess their particular relationship data. For further information regarding this dating site, study our summary of eHarmony.